top of page

"A Hot Take In A Galaxy Far Far Away..."

In the year of our lord 1977 George Lucas graced us with a glimpse into his vision of the Star Wars universe with the release of “A New Hope”. Since the moment this film hit the big screen, fans of all ages and background were captivated by Lucas’s vision and the story of the battles “A long time ago, in a galaxy far far away…”. While the Star Wars canon grew so did the expectations, the number of critics, along with the people and generations watching it. I am here to briefly give a glimpse into some of the possible issues why people have recently been so “disgusted” or “head over heels in love” with the new version of the Star Wars story “The Last Jedi”.

 

When looking at the emotions displayed by Star Wars fans across the globe, I believe it is primarily due to the world you grew up in, along with the people who created the movies. While all of these movies come from the same story originally created by George Lucas, they are not all strictly made in his image. To understand why people have such strong feelings regarding the movies portraying this space chronicle, you must first understand the history and growth of the movies. Following the release of this film, there have been 7 more films released following the same story line. Interestingly enough, none of these films have been in chronological order until the release of “The Force Awakens” in 2015 after Lucas had sold the rights of the Star Wars story to Disney. 

We begin with the “Originals”, also known as the first 3 movies “A New Hope”, “The Empire Strikes Back”, and “Return of The Jedi”. In the first series, the only movie that Lucas truly had a strong influence in was “A New Hope”, although he is credited to the screenplay due to his ownership and creation of the series, he was not given the power to make the movie the way he envisioned it. 

Following the 3 movies that shocked the world and recruited a loyal fanbase, are the “Prequels”. This follows the story prior to the first 3 movies released and in some peoples minds were partly made to fill all plot holes that were poorly created in the late 70’s and early 80’s. In this trilogy, Lucas was not going to be placed on the bench and felt as though he needed to step off of the sidelines and get his hands dirty. Beginning with Episode 1 “The Phantom Menace”, Episode 2 “The Attack of The Clones”, and Episode 3 “Revenge of the Sith”. All of these movies were directed and written by George Lucas, and we are able to see a lot of repetition in the directing styles along with some parts in the screenplay which are painstakingly boring. 

Now we find ourselves in the “Millennial’s Star Wars Universe” as it is referred to by my uncle, who considers himself a Elder Star Wars fanboy. As I stated earlier, Lucas sold the Star Wars writes to Disney prior to the filming of “The Force Awakens” in 2013. When the movie hit theaters people were struck with nostalgia and heavy hearts when their beloved film series had returned. Along with the pervious fans cheering from their wheelchairs, the story also made room in the universe for a new group of fans at a younger age. 

“This is where the fun begins” (Star Wars joke). The story of the Star Wars movies truly is astounding when you think about it. People like to look at it through their own perceptions and in some cases refuse to look at the reality of the situation. Since its first movie there has been nothing but inconsistency within filming and screenplay styles, as well as the overall messages the movie was trying to release to the public. 

 

When push comes to shove, you have to look at the fanbase.  Groups of people from all ages either grew up learning to love the movies from their elders who instilled the “power of the force” into them at young age, or people who have found the movies on their own. While times moves forward, so must everything else, including the movies we watch. Not only did the films have to adapt to the changing landscape of the film industry, but they also had to continue to appease the expectations of millions of fans who all had inconsistent hope for the future of the franchise.

 

Some believe that it was the people who wrote the film who pushed it in the wrong direction. Others blame the way they were directed and how they were portrayed over the years. However I believe that it comes down to the mindset you have when looking at it. Change in inevitable, if you don't know that by now, I assure you that you will have a rude awakening soon enough. While the story grows into a continuing franchise, it will be unable to cater to every-type of fanbase, regardless of age, it has a responsibility to the franchise itself to continue to adapt and survive. That means welcoming new ideas, pushing the limits, and further venturing into the vast universe.

"Get your ass on the couch and watch it the right way"

Throughout the process of my life watching movies, I have become a very opinionated person. Now, sometimes I don't believe this is a very attractive aspect, however when it comes to my love of films, I realized that with something that I care deeply about I might as well have some method to my madness. That is why I have written down some things I have learned over my years that have helped me not only breakdown and decipher a movie, but also has allowed me to enjoy a majority of them much more.

 

 Phase 1:

 

1)Watch The Movie: Although this might sounds painfully obvious, it is important to actually take the time out of your day and focus on all the aspects of the film. So many times now a days we will catch ourselves blankly staring at our phones for two or three minutes without realizing and next thing you know you're asking someone “Wait so Bruce Willis was a ghost the whole time?”. In order to appreciate the film, along with actually having what I like to call “Security Clearance” to judge the film, I believe you must give your undivided attention from start to finish. 

 

2) Watch All In One Sitting: Now this doesn't mean you cannot go to the bathroom, put out a fire in your kitchen, or rescue your cat from a tree, but as soon as that crisis is over I strongly suggest you sit yourself back down and finish what you started. Almost every aspect of film is there to enhance or sway the audiences emotion one way or the other. It should be a consistent feeling throughout the movie that you should be interpreting while watching.

 

3)The next thing to keep in mind when doing this, is to make sure that once you're finished watching the movie/film. To compile your thoughts once the movie is over. Some of the things to jot down to get you started are major plot points, crucial or repeated lines, and particularly notable shots or scenes. Over time, and the more practice you get, these aspects will jump out at you and you will find yourself writing these down as the movie is playing. However it is important to keep track of all the things that you find meaningful so that you can compile and reference back to them as supportive statements for your perspective later on.

 

4) Once you are finished writing down some of your thoughts, I find it very important to give yourself some time to take a step back and collect yourself. Once you settle your mind and give yourself a fresh approach, it allows you to full embrace and understand which aspects of the film stuck true. 

It also can be extremely helpful to write down some more thoughts that you’ve realized after giving yourself some time to decompress the film. Some of these thoughts can include the overall quality and feel of the physical filming methods; such as the way color was used, whether the shots flowed together or seemed inorganic, and finally I like to review my thoughts on if particular character or things were supposed to represent certain things. All of these thoughts that you are looking at during your reproach should be had with the previous aspects you found relevant prior to the film ending. 

 

 Phase 2: 

 

1)Now when it comes to understanding the concept of any movie, you must understand that it has more than once face. When looking into the background and identify of any film you have to understand the narrative the movie is displaying, as well and the background of the movie itself. This can range from the filmmakers intentions to comment on culture or politics, or perhaps even the history of the film and where its ideas derived from. Either way it is important to understand that there is more to meet the eye. (Spoiler alert: Sometimes you might find someone digging a little too deep, which to some people might be a pain in the arse, yet to others like myself, I view it as one of its most fun aspects)

 

2)I mentioned earlier that you must watch the movie in one sitting, this is why I think that is extremely important. Look back to your notes, your emotions and the movie itself. Each movie has an story arc, some better than others, but nonetheless a story arc. While you are sitting on the couch contemplating if the amount of effort it will take to reach 2 ft across the couch to grab the remote is worth it, the movie that is either captivating you or just background noise is a game of ups and downs. 

Much of the success of films is based on its structure. This can relate to the pacing of the story, character development which can play a huge role, and also climaxes or various plot twists and turns. Keep in mind that note taking can come in handy during this stage, notice if the movie was well-plotted and give yourself ample amount of facts and examples for your future-self. 

 

3)While movies are made to be watched, they are born from writing. The movie is grounded by the script that created it, most of the time a very well-plotted movie is born from a well-written one. Be sure to focus on some aspects of the dialogue within the script, compare it to the emotions of the scenes and the characters who are speaking it. Some questions you can ask yourself when looking at the dialogue is how believable it seems. Another interesting aspect of the dialogue within a movie are the loudest and quietest moments. For instance, a well-placed joke can allow the audience connect to the character, or a perfectly spaced moment of silence that can mean nearly as much as the words spoken in the film.

 

4)Following the dialogue in the film, now its time to focus on the acting. This can range from the characters and their role within the film and how believable their actions and demeanor might may be. Don’t confuse this with your personal opinion of how the characters are portrayed or not, but instead focus on if the acting and moments allowed you to believe that these people in the film were truly real. Some other things to keep in mind are accents or speech patterns throughout the movie, including how the actors respond and express themselves with body language in different scenes. 

 

5)The next step which I find the most difficult, analyzing the lighting and camera techniques. Now I myself have worked to learn as much as possible about the techniques used and why they are important to some people. Sure it helps to know what is called what, notice subtle movements that enhance emotions, and shots that crucial to completing a scene, but that shouldn't stop you at this point.

Some movies might rely on lighting to make actors and shots merge together smoothly and visually stimulating other might use lighting to identify the mood depending on a scene. Many movies depending on genre might have a consistent use of lighting from start to finish, and other might rely on lighting to help express emotion throughout the entire film, which in all honestly I believe is painstaking to watch. 

Besides lighting used, focus on the camera shots and how they correspond in some cases or play off of the lighting within each scene. A main aspect of the camera work within a film, is the use of angles. In some cases angles are almost the pointer finger for the director on screen, in other cases they can be used to place a certain feeling on the audience. Do the angles make you feel like you're looking down on people, or perhaps even backed into a corner? 

 

6) Last but not least, the movies soundtrack. Picture yourself either from age 8 listening to “Now #9” on a long drive to visit your relatives. While the throwbacks of your childhood are blasting out of the speakers, you find yourself pairing the music with your own experience of looking out the window. Some call this experience the “music video effect”, but I call it the most satisfying thing.

I am not going to get into the psychological aspect of why music is so appealing and emotionally stimulating. However, I can say with little to no scientific and medical experience, that music can be one of the most influential things when it comes to affecting our emotions.

This is just as relevant when it comes to movie soundtracks. They are used for all types of people to allow them to gage and connect with the mood of the movie along with the important depending on scene. Its important to keep in mind that a effective movie soundtrack depending on scene, should enchase and dance the plot, but it should not be distracting. A prime example of this idea in film is the “Jaws Challenge” (which I literally just made up right now and it is maybe the most mediocre idea Ive ever had). This is when you try to watch at least 5 minutes of “Jaws” attack scenes online with the sound completely off, wait and see how long it takes you to start hearing the “duh duh.. duh duh..” in your head, and if you don’t… well than you're lying to yourself and should seek immediate psychological assistance.

 

 

These past two phases should be used to help you gage multiple aspects of movies you're watching from start to finish. It is important to keep in mind that not all movies follow the same guidelines, path, or conventional rules. However, that is why the art of making a film is so beautiful in my opinion. For each person, a scene might strike them one way more than the entire movie combined. In other situations, you might be dragging through a film up until the last 5 minutes, when everything comes together and you have an epiphany and begin to run around your neighborhood claiming your love for your new favorite film. I believe that film is one of the most influential things in our modern society, and I hope that these past snippets of information which I am sure a lot of you might have heard before, can either enhance your future movie experiences or reviews.

Wait...What Comes At Night?

“It Comes At Night”, a psychological horror film from the depths of Trey Edwards Shults mind, is a movie that has captivated the attention of audiences across the country. This thought provoking movie takes place is a post-apocalyptic world where we still the chronicles of two families fighting for survival. 

    This film follows  Paul (Joel Edgerton) and his wife and son, along with their new addition to their survival estate deep in the woods Will (Christopher Abbott) and his son and wife. When Will is caught trying to find supplies in Paul’s home, he pleads to Paul to have mercy on him and explains that he is only trying to provide for his family. Paul, being a man whose family is his main priority in his life, allows Will to go free and includes Will and his family into their home, in the hopes of “strength in numbers”.

    From the moment the families join forces, this slow burn horror film shows both men experience doubt, frustration, and most importantly fear. Both worried for their families wellbeing, we are able to see the breakdown of trust within the two men and their kin, which ultimately leads their destruction coming from one and other, instead of the virus which has infected their society.

This post-apocalyptic horror film strays from the path of zombies slowly chasing down their victims, and aims to fixate on the most powerful force that can plague a person, fear. The first adversity seen in the film is revealed in the opening scene when we see Paul’s father-in-law being taken away to be buried after he has been infected by the virus. While this movie evolves, and the families join each other for survival, we slowly begin to see that the virus is just the tip of the iceberg. Throughout this film we see the aspect of fear being entrenched into the characters, along with the audience’s perception of the film and its’ scenes. 

    The characters are hesitant throughout the film to let their guard down in fear of letting their loved ones come into any harm. We see the idea of both danger from not only the virus and the world outside of their home, but also from each other within the house. Whether it is Paul maintaining complete control over every aspect of his home, or his fear of his son or wife straying too far from his rules. 

    Shults plants fear into the hearts and minds of his audience through the “unknowns”. We are given only so much information throughout the film about what danger actually exists and what adversity will fall onto the characters. We see dreams and visions from Paul’s sons point of view about the virus infecting himself along with others in the house. Fear of what is hiding in the woods, if anything at all. We are shown brief images and partial aspects of the event of the families dog being found bloody at the entrance of the house. 

    

    The fear of the unknown used in this movie is playing on the fact that our mind makes us see what we want to see. Whether we want to or not, whether we know it or not, our mind produces thoughts, images, sounds, and situations analyzed based on our subliminal emotions we are feelings. This movie uses a rift between two families under extreme amounts of pressure as a canvas for the audiences worst nightmare, along with the portrayal of the worst aspect of the mankind. 

My Alternate Universe? 

The chances of a film being released and having every single person who viewed it leaving the show feeling captivated and blow away is impossible. Whether the person didn't dislike it as much as he or she claims, their will still be people who love to go against the statuesque. I am mentioning this because sometimes the aspect of the film that people dislike isn't necessarily the story, or the chain of events which occurred or the actors, sometimes they just didn't fancy the feeling they had in their guts once the movie had ended. 

    

    When thinking about this, I wondered what aspects of films could have this subtle affect in which people don’t specifically know what it what, but they just are sure that, as my father would say “It just didn't toot my horn”. Personally I feel as though one of the main reasons that some people find their horn left “un-tooted” has a-lot to do with the casting and the decisions made with the characters. 

    

    Now I don't mean to seem as though I am having a revelation about the importance of casting people to play certain roles, but I am just trying to not dive so deep into the analyzes of these films and try to simplify them. Sometimes people make mistakes. Sometimes people have ideas that sound good in their head, but come across as a dumpster fire to other, its basic human nature. 

 

    I have had the idea of almost an alternate universe of movies, and what they might turn out to be. This can range anywhere from directors not capturing the opportunity to create their vision of their break out film, or even an actor such as Jim Carey was first recognized as a drama genre actor, then transferred into the role of comedy instead of how it happened. 

 

    Sure you could be thinking to yourself, “yeah that is a different perspective, it would be interesting to see thing happen slightly different”. I agree, but I have let my mind run wild and created this alternate film universe in my head, and I cannot seem to escape it. 

 

    The idea of film as an art form has been a main part of its identity since the beginning of its time. With many different forms of art, there have been people, culture shifts, and other socioeconomic events which strongly influenced the direction of where the art was headed. 

 

    I now would like to come full circle with the idea that people don't always see eye to eye. Some people strongly dislike things that are practically universally adored. Other seem to always be willing to play devils advocate or go against the consensus of their peers. Now imagine certain influence times throughout the history of film, where a person was given their chance to work on a film at either a different stage of their life. Perhaps a younger more naive director who has yet to gain enough wisdom to accurately portray the story on screen. Possibly a older director who has a more cynical view on the world around them takes a film we cherish today, and puts his own spin on it. 

 

    I write this to simply spark the idea of what could of been. Just to open the conversation instead of your own head so you're asking yourself “what if”. Think to movies that you can remember growing up watching, sure it seems like a small aspect of your growth into the person you are today, but I wonder how it would affect you if those films didn't exist, or even had a different underlining message.

"It's quiet....too quiet"

From flirting with his co-worker in Scranton, to having nearly full creative control over one of 2018’s biggest hits on the big screen, John Krasinski is practically a man amongst boys.

 

The film “A Quiet Place” which was released in early April this year, was written and directed by Krasinski, as well as placing himself in the lead role. 

 

“A Quiet Place” shows something in the film industry which isn't necessarily new, but does show an impressive example of roles within the film industry. The idea of a movie with as much early success as “A Quiet Place” is having, and having a large portion of the creative process being drawn up by one man who also is the protagonist is simply astounding. 

Krasinski who found himself in the spotlight due to his role in “The Office”, and then in the military movie about the accounts in Benghazi “13 Hours”, has grown tremendously and taken full advantage of the opportunities provided to him. 

 

While no movie can be done start to finish by one person, this amount of influence by one person from all aspects of the film is certainly something to write home about. 

 

The influence that Krasinski had in the movie, plays strongly into the theory which was originally founded in France in the early 1940’s during the “New Wave”. The “Auteur Theory”, which is primarily used through critics, states the idea in which the director of a film is viewed as the major creative force which drove the movie. 

 

Now this theory covers the idea of the director having a strong overall influence in a film, which in most cases can ring true, however Krasinski takes it a step further. 

 

Krasinski ability to not only be the driving force behind the brush that painted the picture of the “Quiet Place”, his acting also allowed him to portray his vision of this project down to a T. Not only did he draft up how his character should be seen when interacting with events within the film, while drafting these scenes, he is able to articulate the organic emotions he felt when creating this piece.

Streaming Platforms & Those Who Abuse Them

While I like to focus on the subjects of films and the coverage of the creative process used while making them, I also feel like while our society has developed, we have seen a subtle adaption in the film industry. We have gone from the age of matinees on a quiet Sunday afternoon, to streaming the entire Godfather series from your dark basement couch. 

    

    I asked myself what this new technology has done to the film industry now. Have it hurt the creative process? Has this given more opportunities for films to gain followings that it wouldn't have had prior to modern day?

 

    Today we have, in my opinion, the big 3. We have Netflix, Hulu, and HBO. These platforms allow people to watch practically everything they desire with the click of a button or movement of a mouse. 

 

    Although I would be devastated if I lost the ability to watch what I want when I want it. I cant help but feel this has done nothing but make us numb to the actually artistic aspect of films being created and viewed. I say this because I believe that these streaming platforms have proven to me that quantity does not guarantee quality. With the race between the corporations of these streaming platforms battling to acquire the rights from the studios to upload the movies to their sites, they are also scrambling to produce films and tv shows to hold their audience over. 

 

    Netflix is a prime example of the issue I am trying to bring to the surface. I cannot tell you how many times I have wasted an hour and a half of my life watching a film that is advertised as one of the greatest pieces of work ever created, and it ends up being something that resembles a high school film project with a very large budget. 

 

    I end up kicking myself for watching the movie, then proceed to make the same mistake a day or two later. This has shown me that, unfortunately, this has become the norm within our society with entertainment. While everyone is scrambling to produce the most content to shove into their viewers faces, we rarely have studios or other persons to take the time to create films with depth like they used to. 

 

    I don't mean to sound cynical when I am saying this. I can still write about this from the other point of view. I constantly find films that leave me shocked with horror, or overwhelmed with emotions derived form the screenplay and storyline. We will also have people who refuse to conform to the rushed form of film making. With that being said, I still find that this type of environment we have created, does nothing but stifle our artists today. 

 

    I hate to think about how many times projects or ideas have been shot down or not given enough attention because of the rush these studios or people in charge of the production feel. How many times have we had movies that were forced into certain genres, situations, or overall meanings so that it could hit a target audience or so that it could be finished filming so it can be ready to be released the first week of summer. 

 

    I ask myself this because I do think we have missed out on alot of opportunities of works of art. The sad thing is we will never know. We wont know if something could've swept us off our feet, if a film could've connected with on another level, but wasn't given the time or the care it needed to truly capture the artistic aspect it was created for. 

 

    While I ask myself these questions, I have to accept it regardless. I know myself, and I know the culture we have created in society today. I won’t stop watching movies that have no depth or overall meaning. Ill pay for my subscription to Netflix and the other platforms in fear of missing some elusive piece of content that could possibly knock me on my ass. 

Twenty Twenty-Four

The movie “Twenty Twenty-Four” creates not only a visual experience that the audience can relate too, but provides a character that plays on our fear that anyone can slowly unravel mentally. 

 

In this near doomsday based psychological thriller written and directed by Richard Mundy, we find Roy, played by Andrew Kinsler. Kinsler plays a scientist tasked with keeping the doomsday bunker, Plethura, in working order until the time of the self destruction of mankind takes place.

 

From start to finish of this movie we see a man confident with who he is and his beliefs, slowly begin to question what is real and what is in his mind. As the line between madness and reality begins to blur we see Roy’s confidence in not only his mission at Plethura fade, but along with the confidence in his own perception in his day to day life. 

 

Richard Mundy provided us with a story and film that on paper could seem stale and difficult to transfer onto the big screen. A man alone in a bunker, battling internally with the truth and lies of his own mind could become redundant after a while. 

However, Mundy not only builds suspense throughout the film through the stellar and relatable performance by Kinsler, but also with the cinematography capturing this story.

Kinsler not only plays the role of a scientist gone mad through his own doing, but also allows his character to be someone who the audience relies on. This reliance gives belief to the audience that the scientist is someone who clearly has a rational thought process and has a very firm grasp on reality as well as the situation his is currently in. As we see Roy begin to doubt his own mind, we can relate to the same fear being shown on the screen due tot he fact that we developed a confidence in Roy’s own stature in the situation. 

 

Along with the performance by Kinsler, Richard Mundy furthers the feelings of psychological doubt and fear with a strong presence of cinematography. Mundy perfectly portrays the bunkers attributes with the subtly drained color adding to the realization that the bunker is completely in artificial light. Amongst other things, the long tracking shots of Roy within the bunker and static shots add to the slowly building confusion between madness and reality. 

My Own Worst Enemy

When I first came across the film “Enemy”, I had no idea the kind of rabbit hole I was about to venture down. Jake Gyllenhaal plays the part of two men who apparently show no relation but are essentially the same person. Adam Bell, a university professor who lives a life of repetition and consistency is introduced to a movie by a co-worker. Within this movie Adam sees a mirror image of himself, enter Anthony. Following the discovery of his counterpart, we slowly see a internal and external battle between both Adam and Anthony. Discrepancies with who they really are, along with tensions within their relationships.

After watching the movie and breaking down the evolution of scenes and characters, I believe the following. I believe that both of Gyllenhaal’s characters were reflections of one man. I find confusion on which man it was, but we are given hints throughout the film that these men are in fact the same person and Gyllenhaal’s character is experiencing an internal battle with the transitions occurring in his life.

    We see two types of men, Adam living a routine lifestyle in a bland apartment with repetitions in his lifestyle and relationship with his girlfriend. Anthony whose a successful actor lives a financially comfortable lifestyle with his wife who is pregnant with their child. From the start to finish of this film we see both of these mens lives begin to blend together and we see emotions take its toll on both Adam and Anthony. 

​

For the sake of sanity in both writing and reading of this article, I will refer to the actual man as Adam Bell. I believe that we are seeing the internal battle between the prior side of Adam that he is turning away from with the new responsibilities on the way with his wife and his child. We are shown earlier in the film that Anthony’s wife infers that Anthony had been unfaithful in the past. This I believe is where Adam’s girlfriend come into play in his repetitive lifestyle. The movie shows the evolution of Adam coming to terms with the life he had previously been living, whether that be him being unfaithful, his attendance in the sex club from the beginning of the movie, and the stress that comes with their child on the way. 

Now the idea of spiders is sprinkled in throughout the film. From a spider bring stepped on in the opening scene, massive spiders walking across the skyline of Toronto, passing a woman with a spider head in the hallway, and of course the final scene of the spider in his bedroom which scared the living hell out of everyone who watched the movie. 

After researching the significance of spiders, there is a correlation between this insect and the premise of totalitarianism. The idea of this is first shown to us during Adam Bells first lecture in the beginning of the movie, talking about regimes and the patterns in history. This relates to the relationships within Adams life for various reasons. For example, we see Adam struggling with he adjustment within his life with the child on the way, which is why we see his wife portrayed at a spider at the very end of the movie. We see other examples of spiders throughout the movie in the form of power lines resembling weblike structures. Continued examples is related to the idea of sex and promiscuity that plagues Anthony throughout the movie. This is shown when we see the spider being stepped on in the beginning of the film, and later shown when Adam passes a seductively dressed women with a spider head in the hallway.

WARNING : FOLLOWING VIDEO CONTAINS SPOILERS

Below is the final scene of the film. I share this so that you can feel the same terror that I felt when watching this snuggling in my bed on a quiet Sunday night. 

Influences In Film History 

In one of my previous articles I covered the evolution of roles within the film industry. From actors climbing the latter to stardom, then following up with their involvement in the production and directing of films, we have come a long way from one dimensional artists. I mentioned two modern people in the industry who are great examples in all aspects. Both John Krasinski and Clint Eastwood have had their careers change and their creative control blossom. While it is important to recognize where we stand today, it is equally beneficial to look back to where we started. 

 

One of the most prolific times in film history occurred in France in the mid 1900’s. The New Wave was upon us and provided an excellent canvas for artists to experiment with their pieces of work. One of the most notable participants was Francois Truffaut. This Film Critic and Director is well known for critiquing the “rigid conventions” of traditional French films. His critiques opened up a line of communication and room to grow for all of the people within the film industry. 

Along with his accolades received for his role as a director, he is also known for developing the “Auteur Theory” which I mentioned in my previous piece. Truffaut’s theory stated that the film should be seen as a nuanced representation of the directors personal vision and experience. This theory is resurfacing with the current evolution of roles in the industry today. 

​

While I mentioned the correlation between Krasinski and the Auteur Theory, I also see similarities in another directors career in film. Richard Linklater, most known for his film “Dazed and Confused” follows in the footsteps of the idea developed by Truffaut. 

While some of Linklater’s methods were considered somewhat unorthodox, he is very well known for his films representing his own personal stance and view of aspects of society. His early films focused on and explored “the youth rebellion continuum” which he explained as the evaluation of the generational nuances of the 20-something culture. 

Also if you don't remember this famous line from Linklater's movie...it would be alot cooler if you did.

bottom of page